Folio Society Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire

9 min read

You've seen the photos. Three volumes, quarter-bound in leather, slipcase lined with something that feels like crushed velvet. The spine labels gleam. The paper — thick, cream, almost silent when you turn it. A Folio Society Decline and Fall sits on a shelf like a small monument.

Easier said than done, but still worth knowing.

But here's the thing: most people who buy it never read the whole thing. Not really.

I've watched three copies change hands in my circle over the last decade. One went to a retired classicist who reads Latin before breakfast. On the flip side, one went to a lawyer who wanted "the great books" on display. The third? A designer who loved the binding but admitted, over whiskey, that she'd only made it to the Antonines.

This isn't a review of Gibbon. Which means you know Gibbon. This is about the object — the specific Folio Society editions that have appeared since the 1980s — and why they matter, why they frustrate, and what you should actually know before you drop four figures on a set.

What Is the Folio Society Decline and Fall

The Folio Society has published The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire three times. Each edition reflects a different era of the press — and a different philosophy of what a "great book" should look like in a private library.

The first appeared in 1983. B. Here's the thing — bury's 1896–1900 revision of Gibbon, which remains the scholarly standard. Because of that, quarter-bound in goatskin with cloth sides, designed by David Eccles, printed on Abbey Wove. In real terms, restrained. Academic. In practice, the text follows the Bury edition — J. Six volumes. Practically speaking, illustrations are reproductions of 18th-century engravings: Piranesi, Robert Adam, a few maps. The kind of set a university press might produce if it had a binding budget Which is the point..

Then came 2005. The text? Which means full leather — Nigerian goatskin, blocked in gold. Three volumes this time. But the introduction changed. Day to day, neil Gower contributed new illustrations: atmospheric, slightly abstracted landscapes and architectural fragments. Also, peter Garnsey replaced the earlier academic preface with something more literary. Still Bury. Larger format. The paper switched to a heavier, whiter stock. The whole thing felt less like a reference work and more like a trophy.

The official docs gloss over this. That's a mistake.

The current edition — 2017, reprinted 2021 — returns to six volumes. Quarter leather again, but with a new binding design by Joe McLaren. The paper is a custom cream wove made for Folio. Also, maps redrawn. A new introduction by Christopher Kelly. And here's the kicker: the text has been reset. Practically speaking, not just reprinted. Plus, reset. Which means new line breaks, new pagination, new opportunities for errors.

The Bury Text: Why It Matters

Every Folio edition uses J.Not the 1845 Milman revision. Not Gibbon's 1776–1788 original. Practically speaking, bury's text. B. Bury.

Why? Because Bury did something rare: he treated Gibbon like a living historian. Plus, he corrected errors. Now, he added footnotes — thousands of them — drawing on archaeology, epigraphy, and numismatics that didn't exist in Gibbon's lifetime. He marked where Gibbon was wrong, where he was outdated, where he was brilliantly right That's the part that actually makes a difference..

The Folio editions preserve Bury's apparatus. Mostly. Plus, the 1983 set includes all footnotes. Worth adding: the 2005 condensation moves some to endnotes. The 2017 reset? It keeps them, but the reset means note numbers occasionally drift. I've caught three misaligned references in Volume IV alone That alone is useful..

If you want Gibbon pure — his voice, his prejudices, his 18th-century Latin tags untranslated — this isn't it. Because of that, bury's Gibbon is a conversation across a century. Now, that's the point. But it's also why some collectors hunt for the Easton Press edition (which uses the 1845 Milman text) instead.

This changes depending on context. Keep that in mind.

Why It Matters / Why People Care

You don't buy a Folio Decline and Fall to read on the subway. You buy it because you want a relationship with a book that lasts decades.

The physical experience changes how you read. The paper doesn't glare. The margins invite pencil. That's why the binding opens flat at Volume III, page 400 — right at the founding of Constantinople — and stays open. You find yourself reading footnotes you'd skip in a paperback. You notice Gibbon's irony more when it's set in Monotype Baskerville at 11 point with generous leading.

There's also the shelf presence. In real terms, a six-volume run in quarter goatskin commands a foot and a half of horizontal space. That's why the spines align. The slipcases match. It signals something: *this person takes the long view.

But let's be honest — signaling is part of it. And the 2005 three-volume set in full leather? That was designed for the "library aesthetic" boom of the early 2000s. That's why the kind of buyer who coordinates spine colors with their wallpaper. Day to day, folio knew their market. The 2017 return to six volumes? And that was a correction. A nod to the purists who complained the three-volume compression made the books too heavy to hold comfortably.

The Collector's Calculus

Prices tell the story. So a complete 1983 set in fine condition: $800–$1,200. In practice, the 2005 three-volume: $1,500–$2,500 — the full leather commands a premium. The 2017 six-volume: $600–$900 new from Folio, but secondary market copies already hover near retail And it works..

Why does the 2005 cost more? Scarcity. Now, smaller print run. Full leather. And — this matters — it's the only edition that fits comfortably in a standard three-shelf bookcase section. The six-volume sets need dedicated space That's the whole idea..

But condition is everything. I've seen 1983 sets with cracked hinges from improper storage (upright, no support, leather drying out). The 2005 full leather scratches if you breathe on it wrong. The 2017 quarter binding is more forgiving — but the slipcase corners dent Simple, but easy to overlook..

How It Works: Choosing, Buying, Living With It

Which Edition Suits You

The 1983 six-volume if you want the scholarly standard. The Abbey Wove paper has aged to a warm cream. The goatskin develops a patina. The engravings feel period-appropriate. Downside: finding a complete set in near-fine condition takes patience. And the quarter binding means the cloth sides can fade unevenly.

The 2005 three-volume if you want a statement piece. The full Nigerian goatskin is glorious — deep color, tight grain, gold blocking that catches light. Neil Gower's illustrations are polarizing; some call them

The 2005 three‑volume set leans heavily into the notion of a showpiece. On top of that, its Nigerian goatskin cover is supple yet substantial, the gold‑stamped title catching the light at a subtle angle that feels more ceremonial than utilitarian. Each volume is bound with a reinforced spine that resists the “hinge‑fatigue” that plagues the quarter‑bound 1983 run, allowing the books to stay open without the need for a weighty book‑rest. The illustrations, while polarising, are rendered in a bolder line weight that commands attention; they function as visual anchors that break the density of Gibbon’s prose and give the reader a momentary visual respite before returning to the text.

Because the three‑volume configuration halves the physical bulk, the set is easier to transport — a single volume can be lifted with one hand, and the slipcase, though still a commitment of space, slides neatly onto a standard bookshelf without demanding a dedicated niche. The trade‑off, however, is the increased heft of each individual tome; the leather adds roughly a quarter more mass than the cloth‑bound counterpart, which may be a consideration for readers who plan to carry the work on commutes or to coffee shops.

When deciding which edition aligns with your reading habits, consider three axes: scholarly fidelity, aesthetic ambition, and practical logistics. The 1983 six‑volume remains the gold standard for academic rigor, its paper stock and engraving choices echoing the period in which Gibbon wrote. In real terms, the 2005 three‑volume excels as a tactile statement, its full‑leather binding and striking gold detailing turning the act of reading into a ceremonial ritual. The 2017 six‑volume strikes a compromise, offering a more manageable weight per volume while preserving the classic quarter‑binding aesthetic that many collectors prize for its durability and understated elegance.

Not the most exciting part, but easily the most useful And that's really what it comes down to..

Acquisition strategies merit a brief aside. In practice, a 1983 set in near‑fine condition may appear affordable at $800, but a rebinding or hinge repair can quickly eclipse the original outlay. Which means prospective buyers should first establish a budget that accounts for both purchase price and potential restoration costs. Auction listings often reveal hidden wear — foxing on the fore‑edges, cracked leather at the headbands, or slipcase hinges that have loosened — so a close visual inspection, preferably under natural light, is essential. Reputable dealers will provide high‑resolution photographs of the binding, the interior pages, and the slipcase, allowing you to gauge the true state of preservation before committing Most people skip this — try not to..

Living with a Folio Society Gibbon set is a long‑term commitment that rewards attentive care. Day to day, store the volumes horizontally, supporting the spine with a book‑stand or a custom cradle; this prevents the leather from stretching and mitigates stress on the hinges. Maintain a stable relative humidity (ideally between 45 % and 55 %) and avoid direct sunlight, which can fade the gold lettering and cause the paper to yellow unevenly. Consider this: when opening the books, use a gentle prying motion at the fore‑edge rather than forcing the spine, and consider a soft‑bristled brush to remove dust from the slipcase corners. For frequent readers, a lightweight book‑rest that distributes weight across the entire opening can make the experience more comfortable, especially with the heavier 2005 volumes Surprisingly effective..

Quick note before moving on.

At the end of the day, the choice of edition reflects how you wish to relate to Gibbon’s narrative. That said, if you value a scholarly apparatus that transports you directly into the 18th‑century print world, the 1983 six‑volume is the logical companion. If the pleasure of handling a beautifully crafted object — one that commands a place of honor on the shelf and invites occasional admiration from guests — is very important, the 2005 three‑volume delivers that gratification. The 2017 six‑volume, with its balanced weight and classic binding, appeals to readers who want the best of both worlds: the scholarly depth of the longer set without the logistical strain of a massive, multi‑volume set.

In sum, the Folio Society releases of Gibbon’s magnum opus offer more than a textual experience; they provide a physical conduit to the past, a tactile ritual that reinforces the very themes of decline, endurance, and the passage of time that the work chronicles. The edition you select will shape not only how you read the history of Rome but also how you live with the book itself — a relationship that, when nurtured, can indeed endure for decades Small thing, real impact. Nothing fancy..

Just Hit the Blog

Just Posted

Related Territory

Keep the Thread Going

Thank you for reading about Folio Society Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire. We hope the information has been useful. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions. See you next time — don't forget to bookmark!
⌂ Back to Home